One of the biggest questions for the economy right now is the job market. The headlines are doing a good job covering the immediate issues—labor shortages, wage increases, and so forth. But the more I look at it, there are a couple of implicit assumptions in how we view the job market that need more consideration. For example, much of the analysis has taken what is going on now as something that is happening without any warning and for no apparent reason. But is that really the case?
New Patterns for Labor Market
The start and end of the pandemic are being trotted out as reasons people are quitting in unprecedented numbers, or leaving the labor force, or simply not taking the available jobs at wages employers want to pay. This situation is all being treated as something of a mystery. The implicit assumption is that we will, sooner or later, return to normal. In this case, “normal” means there is a surplus of labor, employers set pay rates and job terms, and employees take what they can get. In other words, while we may be in a seller’s market for labor now, we will be back to a buyer’s market very soon—and stay there.
The more I look at the data, the less sure I am about that assumption. I do think we will get back to something like normal by year-end, in that people will be working again, with most jobs filled. But looking back at the pre-pandemic data, there were already signs that things were changing before the pandemic. Wages have been rising faster than inflation for several years now, as I wrote about at the start of 2020. That shift means something, especially when you couple it with the demographic trends as the boomers age out of the labor force and immigration slows. The pandemic certainly broke the labor market. But as we recover, workers seem to be finding that old patterns are not holding.
Sellers Vs. Buyers
There is no fundamental reason why employers get to set wages. That has been the case for decades, of course. With the boomers flooding the labor force, with immigration high for much of that time, and, most important, with the global labor force exploding with the addition of China, there have been more workers than jobs. The labor market (and it is a market) responded as you would expect, by bidding down wages. Employers could set the terms because they had something workers wanted: jobs.
But if you look closely, all three of those trends are now leveling off and reversing. Boomers are retiring. Immigration is down and likely to stay that way. Even if companies were still globalizing, which by and large they are not, the Chinese working population is declining. The number of workers is going down even as the number of jobs is going up. While we may not yet be in a seller’s market for employees, it doesn’t look like we are still in a buyer’s market for employers either.
What Comes Next?
I am not sure how real this situation is. It might be an effect of the pandemic. I don’t think so, though. As I said, when you look back at the data, this trend pre-dated the pandemic. I do think it is worth a much closer look, and I will be doing just that over the next couple of weeks.
As we move past the pandemic, we need to spend much more time thinking about what comes next. And now that the immediate problems are fading? We can do just that.
Editor’s Note: The original version of this article appeared on the Independent Market Observer.
The information on this website is intended for informational/educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or investment product. Please contact your financial professional for more information specific to your situation.
Certain sections of this commentary contain forward-looking statements that are based on our reasonable expectations, estimates, projections, and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in declining markets.
The S&P 500 Index is a broad-based measurement of changes in stock market conditions based on the average performance of 500 widely held common stocks. All indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest directly into an index.
The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, Far East) Index is a free float‐adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index consists of 21 developed market country indices.
Third-party links are provided to you as a courtesy. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. Information on such sites, including third-party links contained within, should not be construed as an endorsement or adoption by Commonwealth of any kind. You should consult with a financial advisor regarding your specific situation.