|
Back to Archives
Lump sum Distribution from a Rabbi Trust
Question:
There is a client, age 40, earning around $350,000/year, and will be
receiving a distribution from a Rabbi trust NCDC plan in the amount of
$600,000. This company has self-funded the plan, and the entire benefit will
be a lump sum distribution. Are there any strategies to spread out/shelter
the taxation?
Reply #1:
The answer to your question depends on the exact "facts and circumstances"
of your client's situation i.e. exactly how close is he to the distribution?
What is the wording in the nonqualified agreement? etc.etc.
What you are trying to do is extend the deferral without constructive
receipt and income taxation. So the question becomes: If the executive has a
right to choose to keep his money subject to a risk of forfeiture, does he,
because of this choice, really have constructive receipt the moment he has
the right to choose? Changing the payout stream or extending the deferral
period can attract IRS scrutiny and involves a degree of risk as Section 83
that addresses this area has no clear answer.
Some advisors believe that the key to downsizing the risk is to have the
employer and employee "mutually renegotiate" the agreement to change the
payout period or to extend the deferral. You are creating a paper trail to
show that this is a bona fide amendment to the plan -- and that it is not
being done just to avoid taxation. For example, the employee could agree to
provide further services in return for an extension of the deferral period
or to receive additional payout over a period of years rather than a lump
sum.
There are some court cases on "rolling risk of forfeiture” that can be
used as models.
Marie Boric CPA, M,T CFP
Director, Advance Marketing Prudential Financial
Reply #2:
Assuming the client could avoid the constructive receipt and economic
benefit doctrines, one possible strategy would be a "swap" of the NQDC plan
for a split dollar plan. This could spread the benefit out, and possibly
reduce overall taxes, over the life of the plan.
The idea would be that the client would exchange the future lump sum
payout (this could be done on a partial basis) for a commitment by the
company to fund a split dollar plan. (Under the new split dollar rules, it
might be structured as a loan transaction). The life insurance might be
purchased inside of an ILIT and could be single life or 2nd-to-die.
Jean E. Dragon, Tax Counsel
Allstate Life Insurance Company
3100 Sanders Road, Suite N5A
Northbrook, IL 60062
Phone: (847) 402-3590 or (800) 470-4377 x6
Fax: (847) 402-4248
E-mail: jdra7@allstate.com
Reply #3:
First, if he's earning $350,000/yr, and age 40, why is he taking the
distribution unless he has to? Is he staying with the current employer or is
he taking the distribution because he is switching jobs?
Second, since the whole point of this NCDC plan was deferral, maybe he
can make an agreement with his employer (either old or new) to start a new
deferral of his $350,000 that he would be earning the next 2 years. He is
taking distribution income of $600,000 and it seems like he really should
defer what he can. So he takes a hit on $600,000, not $950,000. What a great
opportunity to defer that $350,000 into a tax-deferred growth funding
mechanism....
Roy D. Patterson, JD, CLU
Estate and Business Planning Hartford Life
Reply #4:
One strategy would be for the employee to urge the employer to set up (or
convert an existing plan into) a Section 83 executive deferred compensation
plan. This is a type of plan that appeals specifically to this type of
highly compensated employee and is often used by employers as an attraction
and retention tool. The Section 83 plan allows for the employee to defer up
to 100% of his/her compensation every year and put it in the plan which uses
options as the deferring vehicle. The plan then allows for the "option" to
be funded with an "at risk" investment, such as stocks mutual funds or
variable annuities. In this way, the employee has a right to purchase this
investment at a discount at a future date.
If the employer establishes this plan to benefit the employee, the
employee can (within the parameters of the plan design) exercise his/her
option at any time. He/she can also leave the company and decide not to cash
out of the plan for several years, or may do so (again, as long as allowed
by the plan design) in increments. In this way, the employee is not forced
to take lump sum distributions and may spread out the taxes.
Lena Rizkallah, JD, AVP
Director of Charitable and Estate Planning Special Markets Department
Manulife Wood Logan, Inc.
Phone: (800) 334-4437 x7628

* The foregoing is for broker/agent use only, and is intended solely for
informational purposes. Nothing contained herein should be construed as
legal or tax advice, and should not be relied upon for such. Legal and tax
advice should only be obtained from your attorney or qualified tax
professional.
CES Insurance Agency, Inc., Commonwealth Equity Services, Inc., and all of
their officers, subsidiaries, and affiliates explicitly disclaim any
consequences from unauthorized use of this material.
© Copyright 2003 - Commonwealth Financial Network |